offplan · online
Session · conv-32

Session CONV-32

In Progresssessionconv-32

Resume Prompt

Continue Phase 1.3 sub-plan: Part 2 (Decision Log) is next in plans/permission-and-tenancy-model.md. 10 пунктов queued: workspace switcher mechanics (likely close as cross-ref to onboarding-trial-mode) / ownership transfer detail (mostly closed in 1.5.F) / referral attribution rules (real new design ~30-45 min) / audit log scope для Phase 1.3 events / naming finalisation (Sales Manager + Content Editor) / email mismatch wording (verbatim from Foundational §2 line 765 — quick close) / subdomain reservation full list (5 ratified, ~15 more) / Free Guest → self-paid conversion details / Sales Agent dual-Org membership (Internal в А + External в Б — allowed?) / Open pool mode reversibility. Plus Microsoft OAuth Stage 1 vs Tier 3 Stage 2 inconsistency surfaced в 1.2 (Foundational §2 line 748 says Stage 1 OAuth, ADR 0005 v3 says Tier 3 Stage 2) — resolve в Part 2. Estimate ~2.5-3h total Part 2 work. После Part 2 → Step 4.5 ratification sweep + workstream phase-1-3-implementation (P0); Step 4.4 likely skip (architectural consolidation, no customer-facing surface). Sub-plan currently status: draft — moves to ratified после Part 2 + workstream creation. Cyprus jurisdiction остаётся «active review» — don't re-ask. Roma's parallel git activity — git pull before push.

Summary

CONV-32 Phase 1.3 sub-plan Part 1 ratified — pack-mode /plan session закрыла 10 разделов Behavioural Spec в plans/permission-and-tenancy-model.md (status stubdraft, ~620 lines). Part 1 = 95% consolidation Foundational §2/§4.1-4.6/§5/§6.1/§7.1 + 14 new picks (magic link verification / single-use decline tokens / SA project switcher visibility = ≥1 assigned unit / forward invite Owner+Admin only / re-invite auto-revoke + supersede / self-invite blocked / role change SA-involving = clear assignments / badge «External» SA / tier downgrade explicit block / pessimistic lock 500ms timeout fall-through / etc). Sub-plan + Phase 1.3 callout (status update + Part 1 inline summary) + changelog v4.15 entry committed (os 71c01cd, preview c28fe9f) + pushed origin/main. Part 2 (Decision Log, 10 пунктов + Microsoft OAuth Stage 1 vs Tier 3 inconsistency) — pending separate session ~2.5-3h. Step 4.4 likely skip + Step 4.5 ratification sweep + workstream phase-1-3-implementation создаются после Part 2.

Changes

Decisions

Pack-mode для оставшихся 5 разделов (1.6-1.10) vs interview-style раздел-за-разделом. Пользователь предложил after Section 1.5 ratification — recognising что 1.6-1.10 = 95% консолидация Foundational §4.1-4.6 + §6.1, не interview-territory. Pack-mode ratified all 5 sections + 3 new picks (1.7.F lock timeout / 1.8.F downgrade explicit / 1.9.C external badge) wholesale. Saved ~30 ходов interview vs section-by-section. Rejected: keep interviewing each section — would have produced 5 more «yes пропусти» rounds with little new content.

Sub-plan scope = behavioural + decision log, NOT tech-level spec. Initial framing assumed «tech-level architecture (DB schema / API contracts / library choice)» per CONV-31 resume prompt. Sergey pushback в interview Q2: «зачем эти детали вообще? описать тех команде как реализовать?» — re-framed scope to S1 (behavioural spec UX flows + edge cases + permission rules в business terms) + S2 (decision log open questions). Tech implementation choices = тех команды (Roma scaffold + Ilya estimate). Rejected: full tech spec (RBAC matrix as API permissions / DB schema / library choice) — implementation choice belongs to Roma+Ilya, not sub-plan.

HTML update minimum scope vs full per-task cross-refs. User asked если есть смысл обновить launch-plan-stage-1.html. Recommended минимум (Phase 1.3 callout status + changelog v4.15 + preview sync) ~20 мин — без per-task cross-refs (1.3.1 → §1.10, 1.3.4 → §1.6, etc) которые = +20-30 мин но низкий ROI поскольку sub-plan уже cross-references Foundational §X line numbers. User accepted minimum. Rejected: full per-task cross-refs sweep (deferred — после Part 2 одним проходом если потребуется); и no-update (sub-plan становится «hidden» — Phase 1.3 callout вводит в заблуждение «awaits ratification»).

Foundational §2 entry-point choice screen omission в первом draft Section 1.1. Я скомпоновал draft из ADR 0009/0010 + memory + general patterns, не дочитав Foundational §2 (Регистрация и онбординг) полностью. В §2 уже было ratified: 3 paths (A/B/C), 3-option entry-point screen после Path A signup, login UX 3 options, auth methods 3-way, email mismatch wording, welcome email pattern. Sergey ткнул «ты не читаешь то что мы ранее обсуждаем?». Сохранил feedback memory чтобы перед drafting любой Section всегда grep launch-plan-stage-1.html на topic keywords и читать Foundational + Phase 1.x ranges. Rejected: «можно draft быстро из ADR-уровня, добавим detail на review» — produced incomplete drafts triggering rework + frustration.

Russian-only phrasing slip-list expansion (3rd time). Memory feedback_russian_only_phrasing.md уже существовала с CONV-27. В CONV-32 Sergey ткнул третий раз — «почему опять английский с русском мешаешь?». Strengthened memory с recurring slip-list (16 слов: ratify / rewrite / cover / scope / verbatim / etc) + переводы per word. Rejected: новая memory file с тем же scope — duplicate; better strengthen existing one.

Next Steps

  1. Resume Part 2 (Decision Log) в plans/permission-and-tenancy-model.md — 10 пунктов + Microsoft OAuth Stage 1 vs Tier 3 inconsistency. ~2.5-3 часа total.
  2. Step 4.5 Ratification sweep против Notion Learnings DB после Part 2 closure (~10 мин).
  3. Workstream phase-1-3-implementation (P0) — create в workstreams/ после full ratification.
  4. Step 4.4 Business review — skip likely (architectural consolidation, no customer-facing surface — same pattern as Chunk 8 ADRs).
  5. Sub-plan status flip draft → ratified после Part 2 + workstream + ratification sweep.
  6. 3 sub-plans pending в очереди после permission-and-tenancy-model closure: onboarding-trial-mode.md (P0, ADR 0008) → legal-multi-party-framework.md (P1, jurisdiction-dependent) → buyer-profile-and-presentation.md (P1, ADR 0012 + Phase 1.11.1-8).
  7. Optional: 2 stale Learnings cleanup (CONV-7 5-tier model + CONV-16 S·1 Shared default) — Notion direct edit для deprecation notes. Carried over from CONV-31.
  8. Optional: Brandbook reconciliation (Sergey atelier vs Roma Skeleton White) — отдельная сессия. Carried over.

Open Questions

Context for next session